Wednesday, June 15, 2011

What Really Causes AIDS?

Over 35 diseases hold now been renamed AIDS diseases, whole supposedly caused by one single (inert) virus. What has been considered according to rule pneumonia until 10-15 years gone, if linked with HIV, it is a little while ago an AIDS disease. The same applies to Candida virus, tuberculosis, Kaposi's sarcoma, and cervical cancer. If ~y African suffers from 'slim disease' and has HIV antibodiesin his kindred, he is being told that he has AIDS. If he dies from the ail, he obviously must have died from AIDS. This natural logic may sound persuasive to a devise person.

On the other hand, granting that an African is diagnosed with having 'poor disease' without previous HIV infection and subsequently dies, AIDS is not considered the purpose of death. It is worthy to scholium that there are at least being of the kind which many cases of slim disease free from HIV as there are with HIV, and that the retrovirus HIV has proven to subsist incapable of causing cell destruction, that is the main characteristic accompanying 'poor disease'.

If the HIV virus cannot exist held responsible for causing AIDS diseases, at another time what is the cause of AIDS?

Narcotic Drugs

Roughly ten years previous to the discovery of AIDS, the industrial world experienced a dramatic increase in the practice of non-prescribed drugs ranging from hashish, marijuana and psychedelics to LSD, MDA, PCP, heroin, cocaine, amyl and butyl nitrites, amphetamines, barbiturates, ethyl chloride, opium, mushrooms and other 'tailor-made' drugs. By 1974, five the great body of the people Americans had used the drug cocaine, and solitary 11 years later, the figure had jumped to by 22 million. In 1990, the American Drug Enforcement Administration had confiscated 100,000 kilograms of cocaine, compared to a bare 500 kilograms in 1980. Within a decade, the call over of cocaine overdose victims had increased from 3,000 in 1981 to 80,000 in 1990, an increase of 2,400 percent. Amphetamine appliance also jumped dramatically. In 1989, the Drug Enforcement Administration seized 97 a thousand thousand doses, up from 2 million doses in 1981. Also, aphrodisiacs became extremely popular during the 1970s. By 1980, five the multitude Americans had become regular users of amyl nitrites, or 'poppers'.

The AIDS prevalent followed a huge jump in deaden with narcotics abuse. Every practicing physician who has seen the exact destruction of body and mind in medicine-using patients understands that drugs are open of doing even more harm to a bodily substance than just killing them. Drugs are known instead of their powerful effect of systematically destroying a bodily substance's vital functions, including the immune plan. The figures given above can in nay way represent the total use of drugs not more than the population, but they certainly specify that drug abuse could be playing a greater role, if not the biggest role in causing AIDS diseases. Most stupefacient drug users have p24in their feelings. An HIV test is likely going to translate them into HIV positive patients that 'require' treatment with expensive and potentially devastating AIDS drugs.

Until not long ago, drug use was most concentrated amidst young men aged 25-44, and with equal rea~n, AIDS was most common among this duration of existence group. Nine out of every ten AIDS cases were masculine and 90 percent of all the community arrested for possession of hard drugs were male, too. 75 percent of these were elderly 25-44 and 72 percent of tot~y AIDS cases among men occurred not above exactly the same age group. Could this be obliged been pure coincidence?

Between 1983 and 1987, the king of terrors rate among young men of this verge of life group increased by an average of 10,000 for year and so did the include of AIDS deaths within the sort period. During the 1980s, deaths from drug overdoses doubled in men of this epoch group, while deaths from blood poisoning - some indirect result of the injection of drugs into the common ancestry - quadrupled. The same happened to the AIDS sufferers of the sort age group during the same proposition of time.

Now, more women are involved in hard drug use. Three quarters of completely heterosexual AIDS cases and two thirds of total female AIDS cases are injection put ~s into users. Two thirds of all babies born through AIDS have mothers who inject drugs. These figures chouse not include the use of drugs taken orally or in one inhaled form.

The major percentage of AIDS cases, in whatever manner, is still found among the very much active homosexual men aged 25-44. This form into ~s not only abuses large quantities of sleeping draught drugs, but also antibiotics, antifungals, and antivirals, similar as AZT, ddI, ddC, d4T, acyclovir, and gancyclovir, to denominate a few. A large number of American studies confirmed that completely 95 percent of male homosexual AIDS patients typically admitted to popper inhaling and regular use of hard drugs.

AIDS patients meet with from pre-existing immune damage, which in many cases is caused ~ means of years of drug abuse. Without every already damaged immune system, AIDS diseases are extremely unlikely to develop. If any of the on top of risk groups take an AIDS experiment they are highly likely to ground of admission positive, due to the large designate by ~ of antibodies their bodies have produced to contravene diseases caused by drugs, semen, royal line, and viruses, etc.

Why babies bear AIDS

Babies are strongly affected ~ dint of. the drug abuse of their mothers. Two thirds of every part of babies with AIDS symptoms, regardless whether they test HIV-positive or not, have mothers who dart in drugs; some large percentage of the rest bring forth mothers who use non-injected drugs. Heroin is common of the most commonly injected drugs. Persistent put ~s into users show symptoms of loss of wan blood cells, the main upholder of prerogative, as well as lymph node rise, fever, rapid weight loss, brain dysfunction and idiocy, and a marked susceptibility to infections. Heroin addicts often die from pneumonia, tuberculosis, and other opportunistic infections, considered in the state of well as from wasting syndromes. In every part of these diseases, the protein p24, without particularizing accepted to be proof of the animation of HIV, is amply present. Although p24 is not uncommon to HIV but shared with greatest in quantity infectious diseases, they have nevertheless been classified as AIDS diseases.

What is very mischievous is that babies are defenseless in contact with drug poisoning. Recent research has shown that pregnant women who smoke cigarettes pass cancer-forming chemicals to their babies. It is uphill to imagine what must be apprehension place in the developing brain of ~y embryo when it is exposed to heroin injected forthwith into his mother's blood, what one. is also his blood.

Many babies born to cocaine-using mothers are born with severe mental retardation and are vulnerable to tuberculosis and lung diseases. The major experimental drugs are so poisonous that just use can result in dementia, serious bacterial infections, and total destruction of the immune regularity. The drugs certainly possess a a great deal of higher probability of impairing immune functions in the way that typical to AIDS than a undesigning, inactive virus.

Antibiotics

Most of the patients sufferance from AIDS also have a tedious history of taking antibiotics. Antibiotics may have existence a major co-factor in developing AIDS among the very active homosexual men who be pendent on them in order to guard off the many venereal diseases and parasites arising from non-hygienic sexual practices. Many gays desire received open prescriptions for antibiotics from their doctors who advised them to mouthful the drugs before their sexual encounters. Some of them had been without interrupti~ such toxic drugs as Tetracycline instead of as many as 18 years before their immune system succumbed to the devastating lateral effects they produce. This particular unsalable article causes extreme sensitivity against sunlight. If exposed to sunshine, it can burn one's derm beyond repair. Those affected often bear from Seasonal Affective Disorder (SAD), a configuration of depression that arises from be in need of of exposure to sunlight. The mix with ~s is also known to disrupt the material part 's basic metabolic functions, which may come in virtually any type of illness. It also works as a brawny immune suppressant; and, perhaps, one of its overthrow side effects is the destruction of beneficial bacteria in the intestine. Eradication of these bacteria makes play for yeast and other infection-causing bacteria, spreading from one extremity to the other of the body and causing continuous dazzle-ups of disease symptoms

Other commonly used drugs comprise flagyl and diiodohydroxquin. Both are used to fight amoeba-caused diarrhea. The drugs be able to produce severe forms of hallucination and degradation.

Corticosteroids, sulfa drugs, and septra are prescribed in quest of various other conditions, all with staid side effects. They cause severe digestive disturbances, and if worsened by a nutrient-deficient diet for a like rea~n common among active homosexuals, they systematically devour their bodies' defenses against disease-causing bacteria, viruses and parasites. And to such a degree the formerly strong and healthy young men increasingly stand from opportunistic infections which speed up aging indicators homogeneous to those found only in long-cultivated and fragile people.

Blood Transfusion

All the above mentioned expose to danger factors cause 94 percent of every part of AIDS cases in the United States, a figurative representative for other industrialized nations. Nevertheless, the remaining 6 percent transact not seem to fall into at all of the risk categories. Over moiety of this small percentage 'contracted' AIDS through blood transfusions, which to the general officer population would appear to be a precisely bounded indication for HIV to be the ground of AIDS.

However, a closer dissection of the AIDS survival statistics reveals that superior half of all blood transfusion recipients die inside the first year after transfusion. The sort applies to patients who are not HIV-infected. The put in peril groups for failing blood transfusions are erect among the very young and the highly old, and those who are sharply injured.

Under normal circumstances, healthy the multitude never get a blood transfusion. They are given and nothing else to people who have already suffered from pro~ed-standing illnesses or after traumatic medicinal intervention, such as surgery. Anesthesia alone acts being of the cl~s who an immune-suppressant, and the same applies to antibiotics administered subsequently surgery to ward off infectious microbes. If a patient undergoes an organ transplant, he desire receive steroids and other drugs that thwart his immune system from rejecting the commencing organ. Many organ recipients have to take these drugs conducive to the rest of their lives, except since these drugs suppress overall exemption, they often die from 'unrelated' problems inside a very short time. The treating doctors excellently attribute these deaths, though, to the lateral effects of the drugs, and communicate to the deceased's relatives that they tried everything they could to hold their loved ones. If these similar problems, however, occur in HIV-defined patients, the cause of death is considered to subsist AIDS. Accordingly, the victims become allotment of the 'statistical evidence' that AIDS can be transmitted through blood transfusion.

In the United States, on the ~side of the 20,000 hemophiliacs, who rely in successi~ regular blood transfusions, few are diagnosed by AIDS despite the fact that across three-quarters were infected with HIV from one side blood supply. Mortality rates for hemophiliacs, in event, have never been as low similar to they are today.

It has been proven that descendants transfusions can bring up false-existing in fact HIV test results. In a study published in the Lancet, patients showed the state-room of large quantities of HIV antibodies in their mettle immediately after blood transfusion, decreasing after that. One healthy volunteer who received six following in a series blood injections at four-day intervals tested HIV-negative after the first clyster, but with each subsequent transfusion, the HIV-stubborn antibody response increased. The argument that HIV be able to be transmitted through blood transfusions may, on that account, only be partially true, if it is authentic at all. As the above ordeal shows, blood transfusions can actually manufacture human retrovirus material that may exist identical or similar to HIV. This certainly doesn't despicable that an AIDS disease will automatically advance in successive because of blood transfusion (most hemophiliacs dress in't develop AIDS). However, if the immune order is already severely damaged or base-minded due to other factors, such in the same manner with drug abuse or surgery, blood transfusions have power to greatly increase the risk of developing a life-menace immune deficiency disease or AIDS. If offspring transfusions can lead to the carcass producing antibodies against the HIV human retrovirus, to the degree that research has shown to be feasible, it is misleading to claim HIV-contaminated kin is solely responsible for HIV contagion in blood recipients.

No comments: